As I have stated before, sales processes and methodologies are a must in a world class sales organization. This is what I know from experience through the teaching of others and practice. Leadership should know this too.
Unfortunately, some leaders think it is an unproductive use of sales time. I wonder what system these leaders do use, how it effects morale, what the rep turn over is, how effective sales spiffs are, how they manage performance (before it becomes a problem).
I found this article via Linkedin today. It is from Inc. Magazine and makes a lot of relevant points on this subject.
The author (Eric Markowitz) is on twitter at @ericmarkowitz. I will be following him and you should too.
Eric makes a few good points in his article that I want to build on:
sales quotas have risen nearly 33 percent, yet the percentage of representatives making their quota has fallen by 25 percent
only about 50 percent of sales reps made their quota
“The first thing you should look for when a rep misses a quota is if there’s a sales process in place,” says Levitt. “Most companies let the reps fly by night…and many times the rep is hung out to dry.” Chad Levitt is another sales blogger.
Hmmm. What to do… What to do… A sales process you say.
The rest of the article discusses setting fair/realistic quotas and compensation and what to do when a rep does miss quota. If 35% to 50% of your reps are missing quota you have big problems on your hands.
- Rep turn over
- Sales manager turn over
- Sales leadership turn over
Setting a fair and realistic quota starts with understanding your market’s/customer’s buying process. How much actual selling/prospecting time does the rep have? How many prospects can they contact in a day? What is their closing ratio? How long does it take a customer to make a decision, how much time does a rep have to invest in the decision making process, and how long does it take to deliver the service. In addition, what is the average cost of the product/service being provided. From there it is simple math.
For example, in a high volume sales position:
The rep actually has 160 hours of selling time per month. They prospect three (3) hours per day making 30 contacts, and attending two (2) appointments per day. They invests a total of three (3) hours with each buyer. If one expects that 10% of the contacts will turn into leads that would be 60 leads per week. At a 25% closing ratio that would result in 15 sales per week.
The rep actually has invested about 150 hours per month into prospecting and closing new business (60 hours prospecting, 60 hours qualifying, and 30 hours closing). What happened to the other hours – well factor in windshield time, manager meetings, training, admin, booking the sale, etc.
In this example it takes the rep 3 hours of contact work over a 2 week period to work through the customer’s decision process. If we know these numbers to be true, and we understand how customers make decisions to buy then we know how many prospects the rep should have in a funnel and in a forecast.
If the rep is making 15 sales per month then I would expect a minimum of 15 prospects in the funnel. However, the rep has a closing ratio of 25% so they need four times that in their funnel so they need 60 viable prospects in their funnel. As they qualify their prospects and get closer to the sale/purchase then they can predict the time frame the customer will make a decision and be able to forecast that date with some level of accuracy.
Now if these numbers are fair and accurate the we can set a quota of 15 sales per month. Now this is a rep that is humping it. They are working very hard. They are spending 150 hours of 160 hours per month selling. They better have a company that can deliver on their sales.
Anyway, now I have to have a way for the rep, manager, and leadership to see who are these prospects? Leadership needs to see it at a high level. If their are 50 sales reps then the forecast should have 750 sales predicted based on 3,000 qualified prospects.
Once we know these numbers then it is all about coaching and development which stems from the funnel/forecast inspection. It is incumbent upon sales leadership to have a methodology in place and to be an integral part of that methodology. The article suggests:
‘Tell me about the opportunities that you’re working on, tell me what happened in this conversation.’ It’s literally getting down into the weeds and understanding if the pipeline is real, and if there’s hope. Good managers are doing that on a regular basis, and they know if their pipeline is well-qualified.”
However, I will suggest a rep will not produce a good funnel that the manager can inspect unless the funnel is part of the sales culture from the rep to the CEO. If the funnel culture exists the training and development, and the performance management aspect of the funnel is a lot clearer to everyone.
Why don’t we have 3,000 qualified prospects in the funnel? Why don’t we have 750 sales forecasted? Where are we falling short? Is it one person, team, or group?
or
We have a strong funnel and forecast but are missing our plan. Are we qualifying accurately? Are we inspecting the funnels and forecasts? If qualifying and inspecting are problems where in the organization are they problems? Is it isolated or systematic?
What we have here is the ability to ask great questions about the business and proactively manage performance rather than react to performance (let the reps fly by night). Now leadership can review performance planning, identifying training and development opportunities, refine the sales process, predict work flow, etc.
Is the rep or the team having problems cold calling, linking features to benefits, closing, or are they not working? We are able to use the science of selling to improve the art of selling.
The article states that a responsible company and leadership owes it to their reps to provide a world class sales process to work within. Then they ask the question:
Is it a top-down problem with ineffective management, or is a bottom up problem with lazy employees?
Without a sales process how could one answer that question? Well, I suppose if leadership is not instilling a funnel culture then the answer is clear.
Recent Comments